I was going over the research reports that I "auto-generate" from my genealogical program and realized that I may not have been including my translations in the correct section of the report.
For reference; I looked at, "Cookseys in Tattnall County, Georgia, Loose Papers. (2008)", https://www.historicpathways.com/download/2008-15Dec-CookTattnallLoosePapers.pdf
It appears that the main section under an entry consists of objective statements about the content of the item viewed, which might include quotations and statements of fact. The "Comments", as the name implies, tend to be subjective statements by the report writer. I can see that transcriptions belong in the main section, as they are clearly objective. Being somewhat subjective; should the accompanying translation be kept with the transcription or should they really be part of the "Comments" portion?