I am beginning to revise my work and the first ancestor has a name problem. She has at least ten variations on the records and, though she could read and write, I have no record signed by her. None are used more than once in combination. There are many Trees on this family and they have chosen one of the names, the one settled on after about two generations of descendants. Before that, the whole family seemed to have a name problem.
Would you arbitrarily chose one name, explaining in the source that you do not have enough evidence yet to support this? Then would you put all the others in the AKA field? And do the same for her parents, siblings and children?