Citation Issues

Elements Organization

As I struggle to cope with the inherent inconsistencies of record citations, I am compelled to request an answer to this:

"Do I invariably have the option of organizing any citation elements from 'largest to smallest or smallest to largest'?"

I refer to occasions other than simple, straightforward reference notes.

Wayneson

Parish name or town name in certificates from German churches

I have several items written by German parish offices that certify information from church book entries. Some of them are completely typewritten. Others make use of preprinted forms with the information either typed or written in. These items provide the necessary information for use with the guidelines given in "Derivatives: Copies & Compilations" in EE 7.24 and 7.25 on pages 340-1.

National Archives of Norway

Citing records from the National Archives of Norway has been discussed on this forum several times. I am hoping to get some clarifications. Please refer to the following:

https://www.evidenceexplained.com/index.php/node/1650 (1900 Census of Norway at Ancestry)

https://www.evidenceexplained.com/index.php/node/2070 (Issues citing the Norwegian Census)

What are valid elements to use in a path?

The Archives départementales de l'Isère is a bit unusual, since it does not provide any ark-URLs for directly referencing the images. So; specifying a path seems the only way to cite an image. If I've managed to follow the rules correctly, it seems that the following would be one way of citing the material: