Forums
Dear EE,
In an earlier thread (http://www.evidenceexplained.com/node/2121) you guided me in crafting a schoolbook on Ancestry citation:
"U.S., School Yearbooks, 1900-2016," database with images, Ancestry (https://www.ancestry.com/discoveryui-content/view/371611395:1265 : accessed 20 December 2022), image 30; imaging p. 26 of Wellsboro High School (Pennsylvania), The Nessmuk, vol. 3 (N.p.: n.p., 1932), “Seniors” photos of Wayne Knowlton and sister, Rita Knowlton.
My objective was to choose the option which would provide a "master source list" entry. That has been accomplished. At the risk of beating a dead source, I wish to pose three questions regarding this type of citation:
- Would merely replacing the semicolon following "image 30" with a comma, and eliminating the bridge phrase, legitimately convert this to a single layer citation with overly-stuffed specific item field?
"U.S., School Yearbooks, 1900-2016," database with images, Ancestry (https://www.ancestry.com/discoveryui-content/view/371611395:1265 : accessed 20 December 2022), image 30, Wellsboro High School (Pennsylvania), The Nessmuk, vol. 3 (N.p.: n.p., 1932), “Seniors” photos of Wayne Knowlton and sister, Rita Knowlton.
2. Can it be said that the vast majority (excluding personal web pages) of online citations will be at least 2 layers?
3. In the case of multi-layer citations, can we presume that each layer will include a specific item field (each unique to that layer)?
I ask these with the understanding that an online citation that leads with the original source will always include 2 or more layers.
I hope this will be my last visit to this topic (red-faced).
Wayneson: Q1. Yes. Q2. Yes…
Wayneson:
Q1. Yes.
Q2. Yes.
Q3. Not necessarily.
The QuickStart Guide tucked into the front of EE from the 2015 edition forward demonstrates all these situations.
I so appreciate your respect…
I so appreciate your respect for my learning curve and style. Thanks again!
That's what we're here for,…
That's what we're here for, Wayneson.