Citation Issues

I've pored through this forum and even reluctantly used AI trying to resolve my dilemma, but to no avail.  I am good with the proper format for city directories.  Being a 'splitter', I have come to grips with having separate sources for each year for each city - even though it really clogs my source list in RootsMagic.  And I know we don't get into software issues on this forum, however...

I am currently working on a project that uses a number of vital records posted on the NYC Historical Vital Records website. I have gone over and over the posting from 11/9/2024, https://a860-historicalvitalrecords.nyc.gov/search and I have a question. I created my own template when the website came out, where I used a different website name. But given the URL, and after having studied the blog post, I agree that the  website name is actually Historical Vital Records: The New York City Municipal Archives. 

I have crafted a citation for a blog post, but the item was posted by someone other than the author of the blog post. Do I need to make adjustments to account for that?

I'd like some clarification on when to use [sic]. For example, I have this citation. The record shows the bride's surname as Denison, but her surname is actually Denson. Would it be better to use [sic] in this case or the correct surname, also in square brackets?

In Evidence Explained (4th edition), a citation involving a URL usually includes the word "accessed" before the date accessed, but sometimes "accessed" is omitted. Example below from 12.9, p. 482. Does this mean the word "accessed" is optional?

Hello Elizabeth!

Can you please describe how to cite family trees?

:)

I seem to be struggling when documents are not in named databases re: what should be included or is sufficient.

I've crafted this citation for a deed record, but it appears to be a probate records collection, so I'm confused.

I have recently found the nomination forms for the National Register of Historic Places have been digitized and are on NARA's website (They are also on a site from the National Parks Service, but I find the NARA citation to be more straightforward), but I'm still unsure about this citation.

I have not used the manufacturing censuses. I went ahead and copied the information from the "Source Citation" listed at Ancestry for the "citing..." layer.