Negative evidence | Evidence Explained

Negative Evidence: Evidence that Negates?

Our last posting about negative evidence and EE’s QuickLesson 17 drew quite a few shares. That led to an interesting discussion on the page of one of those who shared the posting. At the root of that discussion lay another common confusion: Negative evidence is not a “finding” that NEGATES something else we found.

Read more about Negative Evidence: Evidence that Negates?
Log in or register to post comments
862 views

Negative Evidence vs. Negative Findings

A teaching tool for researchers just came across EE's desk. To paraphrase: The tool asks whether a needed record exists. Then it instructs: If it does not exist, you now have negative evidence.

No. Nope. Non and nyet!

Read more about Negative Evidence vs. Negative Findings
Log in or register to post comments
1282 views

Applying the EAM to DNA: Part 3, Evidence

Why do we take DNA tests? Reasons vary. Many people hope it will “tell me who I am.” That’s a reasonable expectation for adoptees and others with questions about their own parents and siblings. Others swab or spit because they think it will tell them where their ancestors come from. Experienced family historians turn to DNA to help resolve questions for which paper-trail research has turned up no explicit answer.

Read more about Applying the EAM to DNA: Part 3, Evidence
Log in or register to post comments
352 views

Negative Evidence? To Use or Not to Use?

16 August 2014 Evidence is messy. Because it is a mental construct, it rarely gives us the clear and simple answers that we seek. Sources, by contrast, are physical: we can touch them, see them, smell them, hear them. ...

Read more about Negative Evidence? To Use or Not to Use?
5 comments
Log in or register to post comments
7998 views