Forums
I would be interested to know how others have cited Griffiths Primary Valuation and Valuation Revision Books (Ireland) in Legacy. None of the available options listed in the Source Template Index on Legacy would appear to be what I need, but that might be because I don't understand many of the terms used in the lists?
Maryelizaf, EE covers various
Maryelizaf, EE covers various versions of Griffith's Valuations at 11.63 and 11.65. In the third edition, the coverage spans pages pp. 634–37.
Thank you Editor for your
Thank you Editor for your response. I know how to cite it if I was writing something and adding my own citations. My query was more in terms of using Legacy's Master Source template to do it as Legacy does not include anything specific. It would appear I would need to create my own source citation within Legacy's template. Thank you for taking the time to respond.
Maryelizaf, here at EE, we do
Maryelizaf, here at EE, we do not attempt to be experts on the use of all the varied relational-database software. What we focus on are the principles that apply across the board regardless of what tools you are using. I've cross-posted your query on EE's Facebook page, so a Legacy user may see it and offer you more specific advice, there or here. Have you also queried Legacy's user forum?
I posted on Legacy's fb page
I posted on Legacy's fb page and it was someone there who suggested I try here. I think I will create and add a source to the Master template and use that. I've had lots of experience in citing at tertiary level, so the citation itself is not a problem, just where to fit it in Legacy's Master list :) Thank you again.
You're welcome!
You're welcome!
This seems to be the only
This seems to be the only thread relating to the Valuation Revision Books in Ireland. I have read EE 11.63 that relates to the 'Primary Valuation of Tenements' (aka Griffiths Valuation) but I am having difficulty in citing the follow on "Valuation Revision Books" (images) available on the Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI) website.
It is a database, but it is also has images of the records. I am trying to cite the image, but realise that the below attempt relates more to the database? How would I cite the actual image.
My initial attempt is:
"Search Valuation Revision Books (VAL 12B)," database with digital images, nidirect government services (http://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx : accessed 2 May 2016), Drumbo (townland), Fermanagh (county), Derryvullan (parish); image, John Somerville, p. 12 (penned), Barony of Lurg, Parish of Derryvullan, Union of Irvinestown, Electoral Division (ED) of Irvinestown; reference to map 3abc; citing Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI), VAL/12/B/27/9A (1864-1868).
Help ?
Many thanks from down under.
Robyn
Robyn, the most important
Robyn, the most important thing to remember when our citation involves layers is that details from one layer should not be mixed in with details from another layer.
Using your citation above I went to the URL and found the search boxes. However,
So, yes, your data "gets us there" and tells us considerably more than we need to re-locate the record, but the manner in which it's given is confusing because the details from the original book are given intermittently with the details from the database. To find the right record in that database, users have to wade through many place names that are irrelevant to the database, to find the two that the database needs, but even then the user doesn’t have the database image number.
Let's try sorting out the differences here, keeping these two principles in mind:
Emphasis on record:
“Irvinestown Union, Irvinestown E.D., Co. Fermanagh, VAL/12/B/27/9A, ” p. 12, John Somerville, Barony of Lurg, Parish of Derryvullan; imaged at "Search Valuation Revision Books (VAL 12B)," database with images, PRONI: Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (http://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx : accessed 2 May 2016) > VAL/12/B/27/9A > Drumbo (townland) > image 16 of 90.
Here, you will notice that all the data given in the first layer, the layer that identifies "Book," page, individual, distinguishing data, are details physically visible to us when we view the images. All the details in the second layer are those we need to get us to the right image within the database. If we reverse our priorities, we still keep those elements in their same arrangement.
Emphasis on database:
"Search Valuation Revision Books (VAL 12B)," database with images, PRONI: Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (http://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx : accessed 2 May 2016) > VAL/12/B/27/9A (1864–1868) > Drumbo (townland) > image 16 of 90, for “Irvinestown Union, Irvinestown E.D., Co. Fermanagh,” p. 12, John Somerville, Barony of Lurg, Parish of Derryvullan.
You will notice that neither case uses the phrase “citing … .” The principles or distinctions that apply here are these:
Dear Editor,
Dear Editor,
Thank you for taking the time to reply my post and for the clarification of using the word 'citing'. It's something that I often still get confused about why I am using it.
In regards to Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, i.e. PRONI; their website sits within the nidirect government services website - https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/ as https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/proni
I guess that is why I used nidirect government services as the name of the website, instead of Public Record Office of Northern Ireland.
Because the URL 'appears' to be stable for the Valuation Revision Books (plus they have other 'stable' URL's for indexes/databases etc available online), that was the reason I used the URL http://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx) in my citation. I felt it would allow people to go directly to the Valuation Revision Books, instead of having to navigate through the main page of nidirect government services, doing a search for PRONI (as it is not apparent on their main page) then having to find by another 3-4 further clicks to get to the correct page from the initial website. I am interested to learn your thoughts on this.
When you actually click on http://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx, the options to find a record are Placename, and/or County and Parish. The search mechanism does not provide an option with the occupier’s name. Because townland names in Ireland are often duplicated in different Counties, I thought that by specifying Drumbo (townland) Fermanagh (county) and Derryvullan (parish), it would enable others to find the record. Perhaps I should have been more specific and added a path; i.e. Placename > Drumbo, County > Fermanagh, Parish > Derryvullan. The reference to this Revision Book VAL/12/B/27/9A obviously relates to other townlands besides Drumbo, so if one follows the path as above, they would perhaps find the record with less difficulty? But where would I place that path?
I realise that the record result shows 90 images, but I thought that by specifying p. 12 (penned), that it would be regarded as being page 12 of the book/record, and not as image 12 of 90. So I am a little confused about your point of:
The viewer told me there were 90 images, so I turned to "12"—that being the number you gave above. But, Somerville wasn't on that page. The penned page number on image 12 is actually 8. Thumbing four more images, I found the original p. 12 easily enough.
I will attempt to write another citation and repost here for review.
I am very grateful for your opinons and guidance, as I would like to try and 'master' better techniques when it comes to citing records.
Best Regards
Robyn
Robyn, you wrote:
Robyn, you wrote:
I realise that the record result shows 90 images, but I thought that by specifying p. 12 (penned), that it would be regarded as being page 12 of the book/record, and not as image 12 of 90. So I am a little confused about your point of:
The viewer told me there were 90 images, so I turned to "12"—that being the number you gave above. But, Somerville wasn't on that page. The penned page number on image 12 is actually 8. Thumbing four more images, I found the original p. 12 easily enough.
Let me try explaining it a different way.
You also wrote:
I thought that by specifying Drumbo (townland) Fermanagh (county) and Derryvullan (parish), it would enable others to find the record. Perhaps I should have been more specific and added a path; i.e. Placename > Drumbo, County > Fermanagh, Parish > Derryvullan. The reference to this Revision Book VAL/12/B/27/9A obviously relates to other townlands besides Drumbo, so if one follows the path as above, they would perhaps find the record with less difficulty? But where would I place that path?
No, you should not have added those other place names into the path. They represent "helpful information" and "personal identifiers." As such, they are included in the citation. But they are not part of the path created by the database--the path we follow within that database to get to the image we want.
The path is this:
(http://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx : accessed 2 May 2016) > VAL/12/B/27/9A (1864–1868) > Drumbo (townland) > image 16 of 90.
In other words, to reach the image, we do this:
At that point, we have arrived at the correct page of the original book, so we start a new layer in which we record all the details that identify the original.
If we add into the path all the other known placenames (Irvinestown Union, Irvinestown Electoral Divison, County of Fermanah, Parish of Derryvullan, Barony of Lurg), then we confuse the issue because those are not waypoints or markers used by the database path. Some of them are pieces of information we could use at the initial search screen to help us find an unknown entry, if we do not know the VAL number; but when we know the VAL number, we take a spcific path to get to the image and those other pieces of information aren't in the path that takes us to the image.
Where do we place the path? The two examples that I gave in my last message demonstrate where to place the path, depending upon whether our citation emphasizes the database or the record.
You also wrote:
Placename > Drumbo, County > Fermanagh, Parish > Derryvullan.
I think you might be confused here by the > sign that marks the path. It does not mean = (as in Placename = Drumbo, County = Fermanagh, Parish = Derryvullan). The symbol > means "greater than." When we read the path string, each element before the symbol is larger than the element after it. As we work through the path we are drilling down to smaller and smaller elements until we arrive at the smallest element--i.e., the record we want.
Thank you again for your
Thank you again for your responses; they have been really helpful and have made me have a total rethink about various citations methods I have been using (besides this one).
Robyn Ritchie
You're welcome! Glad to help.
You're welcome! Glad to help.
I've only ever sen waypoints
I've only ever sen waypoints described in terms of online resources, where they help navigate the various databases and hyperlinks. Does anyone ever use them to describe an unusual path taken in a real archive? For instance, when something is not filed in the location you'd expect, or in a little-used annex room, or maybe even offsite? I have instances of this but I have simply resorted to a wordy description.
Tony
Tony, we use "waypoints" in
Tony, we use "waypoints" in every citation to archival material. We just haven't used that term to describe them and we use standard punctuation between them. Using the simple example at EE 3.8:
John Ball to Thomas Massie, letter, 14 April 1792; Massie Papers, MSS 1M3855c; Virginia Historical Society, Richmond.
Here, we are saying that we used a letter (John Ball to Thomas Massie, 1792), which is in the Massie Papers (Manuscript MSS 1M3855c), which is at the Virginia Historical Society, which is in Richmond, Virginia. Each item is one waypoint along the path.
In standard format for archival material, U.S. style, the path goes from small to large—rather than large to small as we would do at a website where we go from the publication (the website) down to the series, to the collection, to the file, to the document. If we were to express the above using waypoint “punctuation,” it would look like this
John Ball to Thomas Massie, letter, 14 April 1792 < Massie Papers, MSS 1M3855c < Virginia Historical Society < Richmond, Virginia.
In this case, each waypoint in the citation would be followed by a less-than sign (rather than a greater-than sign), because each element or marker is smaller than the one that comes after it.
To use a more complicated example from 11.45—a U.S. National Archives example:
Affidavit of William J. Haralson, 15 November 1872, p. 2; Lemuel J. Standifer vs. United States, Records of the Southern ClaimsCommission, disallowed claim no. 625, Office no. 69, Report no. 3; appealed as Court of Claims no. 4789, Congressional Jurisdiction Case Records, 1884–1952; Record Group 123: Records of the U.S. Courtof Claims; National Archives, Washington, D.C.
We could punctuation this as waypointsL
Affidavit of William J. Haralson, 15 November 1872, p. 2 < Lemuel J. Standifer vs. United States < Records of the Southern Claims Commission, disallowed claim no. 625, Office no. 69, Report no. 3 < appealed as Court of Claims no. 4789 < Congressional Jurisdiction Case Records, 1884–1952 < Record Group 123: Records of the U.S. Courtof Claims < National Archives < Washington, D.C.
As you know: outside the U.S., standard citations to archival material often begin with the largest element and work down to the smallest. In this case, the waypoints would be connected with the same greater-than sign that is used for following a path at an online site where we go from the website > series > collection > file > document.