Citation Issues

I have a question on citing the microfilm rolls that FamilySearch have been digitized, and you can access from the catalog, but they have not yet added waypoints or created a database for the content. This is the case with the Utah Supplemental Census Schedules, FHL microfilm 4,136,592. 

I want to cite more than the microfilm nubmer, because I viewed it online at FamilySearch, and I want to add the image numbers and URL.

How is this for a draft citation?

Hi,

I have a project where I need to include digital images of the original records. I therefore have to find out how to include the file name in the citation.

Let's say I went to Statsarkivet in Oslo, Norway, and made a paper copy of the record cited in EE, 2nd edition, page 364, scanned that copy to make in into a digital image named "Otto Pedersen 1855 vaccination.jpg", which I then finally sent to my client along with other images and my report. Would the following citation then be correct?

Greetings,

I am trying to discover the best way to cite an ancestors marriage, found on their childrens birth record.  Using ScotlandsPeople, I found two Statutory Birth records (images), that contain the childrens parents, marriage date and place, mothers maiden name, father and his occupation.  I did search a Family History Library film trying to find this Irish marriage. Parts of the film was missing and illegible.

In the QuickCheck Model for Private Holdings: Interview, Tape & Transcript citations there is a place to record both the name of the person interviewed and the date the interview happened.

For citing National Government Records, Evidence Explained includes three categories: original materials (such as manuscripts and photographs), databases, and image copies. Into which of these categories would fall original materials that were sent to me as image copies by an agent? I have not viewed the original paper documents, yet the images I have seen are neither from an online database nor on microfilm.

Dear Editor,

When a county clerk creates a register record and forwards it to the state, is the state leading element (the author) in the citation or is the county?

Looking at an image from FamilySearch "Michigan Births, 1867-1902," the register states at the top of the page "To the Honorable Secretary of State of Michigan: Return of Births in the County of Luce."

Image no. 1 in this set is the FHL microfilm information which identifies it as originating with the "Dept. of Vital Records, Lansing, Michigan."

Should my citation be something like this:

I've gone round and round with this, had one post all typed up and then decided I figured it out and deleted it, but then decided I had no clue. So here I am again.

My dad's driver's license, the actual one he carried in his wallet. It gives his dob (and so far I've not gotten my hands on a birth certficate) and address, proves residence, etc. Is it considered an Artifact?

I've searched this forum for any mention of driver's licenses, no luck.

I did look at state records, Misc. Licenses, 9.19, but that doesn't seem to apply as they reference a record group.

I just received my grandfather's file from NARA Atlanta in an email. I have Evidence Explained, second edition and I am a bit confused with the QuickCheck Model. Would this be my citation for the file?

James John McCarry pension file, SS no. 716-09-2211, 1954; records of the Railroad Retirement Board, 1934-, National Archives Record Group 184; RRB-Congressional Inquiry Section, Chicago, Illinois.

Pat O'Donnell Kuhn

First off I want to say thank you for the GREAT book, and the time/effort invested in not only it, but this forum. From the day I started on family history research I've paid attention to citing my sources, and now after a couple of years I'm enjoying taking to the next level.

Dear Editor,

I can't to wrap my head around subsequent footnotes. Is there any logic to when you cite the record group and repository in subsequent footnotes or is it just a matter of personal preference?

For example, in the Quickcheck model for Maps at the National Archives (EEv3, p. 543), the subsequent note cites RG 77, NA-College Park.

But the subsequent note Quickcheck model for State-level Land-Grant register (EEv3 p. 490) only cites the document and omits the series, record group and repository.