Citation Issues

Questions on access year in source list entries

In section 11.33 Military: Draft Registrations, it lists the following source list entry:

“World War I Draft Registration Cards, 1917–1918.” Database and images. Ancestry.com. http://www.ancestry.com : 2007.

My question in in regards to the listing in the source list entry of the year of access. If one finds records in this database over the course of a few years, it would seem redundant to have a source list with the following entries:

Census citation uncertainties

I continue to be uncertain about the typical or appropriate or better way to cite certain aspects dealing with census images.

I am looking at the QuickCheck Model Microfilm: Population Schedules 1880-1940 on page 248 (third edition).

The first reference note includes both page 246-B (stamped) and sheet 12-B.

Layered Citation

I am trying to construct a citation for an online image of a typescript (published) that's a collection of abstracts of wills.  I would like to include the citation to the original source given in that collection.

Since this is an online image, I thought the citation should lead with the item in the image (as if I'm citing the original).  I couldn't figure out how to cleanly include the citation to the original records, so I rearranged the layers of the citation, and ended up this way:

City Cemetery and Burial Records

I think I have a doozy of a citation problem for you.

I am trying to write a reference note to a Savannah, Georgia cemetery & burial register on Ancestry.com.

The database on Ancestry.com is titled “Savannah, Georgia Cemetery and Burial Records, 1852-1939.”

So, if I put my ancestor's name, Lizzie Sample into the search fields, an entry comes up for her on the results page.  For that image I wrote a citation like this:

Citing Tanguay Collection

I have been searching and searching and I am just not sure how to deal with this at all. I'm trying to create a citation/template my my sources from the Tanguay Collection. I have multiple digital images that I have downloaded but I'm having difficulty deciding how to even start. Should it just be treated as an book with online images? I do realize that if a website has reproduced the copy online I will need to cite that webpage and not the item directly but I'm just not sure what category it would fall under. 

Any direction would be much appreciated. 

 

Compilation of Extracts from Books & Journals

I contacted the Smith Library of Regional History in Oxford, Ohio for assistance in obtaining information on a person who had taught at the local university in the 1830's. In turn, they contacted the university's archives which sent them a two page paper that had been prepared at some point in the past which extracted and compiled references to this person from the university's board of trustees' meeting minutes journals and various other publications about the university. This two page paper was then forwarded on to me as an attachment to an email from the regional library manager.

An original personally held document that is likely copied in an archive

How best to cite an original personally held document (baptism cert.) for which there is either a record entry or copy of the certificate in a church (Anglican) archive or record repository. Seems there is no way of knowing if the archived item is an entry in a record or a copy of the actual certificate.

Thanks!

Citing online image of a Land Grant

I just recently discovered EE and I love it! I am currently trying to update all my citations, but I have one that is stumping me. I recenly found a land grant with an online image of the documents at the Texas GLO website. My first problem is that I cannot figure out if I should be citing this sources as a database or an archive. My second problem is the documents are an online image of the original documents kept at the Texas GLO Archives, so if I am not mistaken I am going to need to have 2 layers to the source, a layer for the actual document and a layer for the website.

Placement of reference number

If I am stating several items over multiple sentences relating to one source, do I place the note after the first sentence in the sequence or the last? 

Example 1, with note on the first sentence: In the 1900 census, John was living in Crawford County, Indiana.1  He was working as a farmer.  His wife Sally and their three children were living with them.