I am using Polish church register images from digitized microfilm which is now available online.
The images are the second copy (transcription) of the parish register which was filled out by the parish priest and sent to the state as required by Napoleonic law. The microfilm now resides at the Central State Historical Archives of Ukraine in L′viv.
In the 4th edition of EE (pp. 72-73) it talks about FamilySearch record sets that have been indexed, and those that haven't (though I have found some that haven't been indexed, but do have a collection title). But it appears there is another type ... or is it just one of these two?
Why does Evidence Explained (EE4: Complex Website Template 5, p. 121) choose to italicize website titles while Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS: 14.206, Notes and Bibliography) does not recommend italics for most citation?
Good morning!
I am using FamilySearch's new AI text search like it's a new toy! So I am citing the images directly rather than a database title.
I have a few questions about the following citation and would appreciate comments.
Marshall County, Tennessee, County Court Clerk Minutes, Vol. A, page 444, Thomas Ross appointed administrator of Samuel Hillis estate, 7 December 1840, imaged; FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/records/images/ : accessed 13 December 2024) > IGN 007642977 > Item 1 of 3 > image 231 of 234.
Hello,
I am trying to figure out how one would cite to documents (for example: a complaint, a legal brief, a motion, etc.) for historical unpublished cases? In this particular instance, the case files are obtained from the Superior Court Clerk's Office
I have attached an example of the first page of a complaint.
The example cite I came up with per 8.19 is:
Many genealogy programs include a "relationship calculator". How would one cite the "relationship calculator" as the source for the stated relationship in a sentence such as: "John Doe was the uncle of William Smith."
I am having trouble even developing a citation for the loose document located here within a bound volume:
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C914-LH9N-B?i=777
To add, outside of the dates (1829, 1834) and "Day-Book," I cannot make out what else is listed on the book's spine:
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C914-LH38-L?i=562
I am hoping you can provide some guidance.
Hello, EE,
I’m puzzled by what seems to me to be an inconsistency in EE4’s construction of subsequent reference notes for state-level vital records certificates and register pages viewed as online images. Sect. 11.39, p. 451, subsequent note 13, does not mention the website. That’s as I expected for a subsequent note. However, Sect. 11.40, p. 453, subsequent note 13, reads:
“Texas Deaths, 1890–1976,” FamilySearch, certificate image, Walter Preston Morse, 1942, no. 2908.
I've crafted the following citation, but my real question is whether I need to indicate that the records are only available to view at FamilySearch Centers and affiliate libraries?
Grayson County, Texas, "Marriage Record H (Aug. 1884-Dec. 1886)": 429, Still-Quinn, 10 November 1885; digital images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org : accessed 6 Nov 2024), image group number 4705887 > image 247 of 649.
A colleague has me rethinking my citations for NYC vital records found online. Our differences lie in layer 2 and how we each interpret the website. Perhaps you can provide some insight on how to best cite it? Here are our examples…
Brooklyn Borough, New York, death certificate, no. 2788, for Phoebe Williams Hendrickson, 31 January 1918; New York City Municipal Archives, “Historical Vital Records” database with images, NYC Department of Records & Information Services (https://a860-historicalvitalrecords.nyc.gov/view/5179597 : viewed 9 November 2024).
or
