Citation Issues

I have an interesting situation in Oklahoma. The marriage records purport to be from Le Flore county (that's what the title on the volume says https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9Q97-Y339-QSFS 

But if you scroll to the first record past the index https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9Q97-Y339-QSJ6 you see that we aren't in Le Flore county, we are in Indian Territory, Central District. Which is legally right as this area won't become Le Flore county until 1907 when Oklahoma becomes a state.

I've read over sections 12.55-12.58 in the 3rd edition (revised) on the subject of citing directories, but am still a bit uncertain as to how to shorten and consolidate citations for a span of years, especially when I've found the directories imaged online.

I believe that a typical (full length) first reference note might look something like this;

I have found two books my mother won at school as prizes. Pasted into the front of each is a plate with the date, the name of the school and the prize she won.  How do I cite this?

I have several physical certificates that I received from the GRO many years ago. I recently purchased the updated EE book, 3rd edition, revised (kindle), 2017. I then reviewed the 2-3 forum posts on citing GRO certificates.  I noted that the ones referring to citing physical certificates do not resemble the example in section 9.48, p. 474-475. So, I thought I'd best ask if views on the content/structure of such citations had changed since the book was released?

Is it my imagination or did someone say that EE nor longer requires the citation line (citing National Archives and Records Administration microfilm M33, roll 57) on the federal census because they are so readily available online? I have continued to include it but now I wonder if it is overkill.

I would like some help in crafting a citation for the following record:

https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C13459274

I did visit the TNA in Kew last year, and looked at the "original" record at the archive. I have included a partial copy.

This is what I have come up with so far.

Enlistment record for Alexander Herd, 14 October 1793; Royal Horse Artillery: Description Books; Ordnance Office, Military Branch, and War Office: Royal Artillery Records of Service and Papers, 1793-1813; RG WO 69/2; The National Archives, London.

I’ve tried my question previously and received one reply that did not help me understand my issue. All my sources are from things published in the 1800s or early 1900s in newspapers, journals, books. I have online sources of newspaper articles (via Newspapers.com, Genealogybank.com, etc.) online journal fiction and non-fiction pieces (found at places like Internet Archive, Hathitrust,org, etc.), online books (found at places like Google Books).

Hi everyone I'm in the process of going over all my sources for a book I'm writing on my dad's side the family. I manage to get a copy of Evidence Explained from my library and its been endlessly helpful but its also hard to find the exact answer to something I'm just now learning to how properly formate things. I used A LOT of articles from newspapers.com. I've been trying to work out how I could cite both the website version and the print version at the same time so others would know how to look for the hardcopy if need to.

Good evening!

Several years ago I visited an archive in Ukraine where I had the pleasure of reviewing church registers. I now am preparing my first citation to one of those records and a few questions are coming to mind. I’ve drafted a citation as follows:

Dear Editor;

Perhaps a seemingly trivial question, but your opinion would be appreciated.

Sometimes the way in which ScotlandsPeople states their reference numbers could result in recording them incorrectly. I believe I have a solution, but I'm wondering about just how much leeway I have in the way I cite them.