Forums
Dear EE,
Several of my ancestor's military records are in a manuscript collection. Samuel Day was a volunteer.
My source entry is for the collection. The records are not online; I paid to have photocopies made. I included the website URL as a help to finding the collection. Omitting the collection ID (see First Reference Note, below) from the Source List Entry comes from the Library's suggestion for preferred citation and possibly some QuickCheck models from EE 1st ed.
Source List Entry: "Day, S. MSS 1857-1895". Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington (https://archives.iu.edu/repositories/lilly).
Actually a direct link to the collection is: https://archives.iu.edu/catalog/InU-Li-VAD6276
I think I included the more general URL as likely more permanent (who knows??)
The collection includes a "diary" (consisting of 24 loose pages), military papers, citizenship certificate, and certificates showing his elections as Justice of the Peace. So I have source citations to each of these.
My question is this:
Looking at EE for Military & Pension Records (4th ed.) beginning at 12.27, I see including the soldier's rank, unit, and war are essential to finding the records. Since the way to find *my* documents is through the manuscript collection at the university, should I include the soldier's information in my source citation? And, should I include it for each of the military documents (discharge cert., window's pension, etc)?
First Reference Note: Samuel Day (1st Sgt. 8th Indiana Battery, Civil War), Volunteer Descriptive List (1864); collection ID LMC 1262: "Day, S. MSS 1857-1895"; Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington (https://archives.iu.edu/repositories/lilly). Photocopies provided by library staff, 2024.
For some reason, I picked up on putting the info in parentheses looking at the Pension examples at 12.35, but I see the examples for the other types of documents don't do that.
I've attached the example document.
Thank you,
Jeff Hodge
Hello, Jeff. To begin with…
Hello, Jeff.
To begin with basics:
The records you are using are covered by Chapter 4, Archives and Artifacts. More specifically: 4.12 “Basic Pattern: Documents.” The models there are cross-referenced to Template 8 “Formal Archives (Artifact or Manuscript Document).” The building blocks, to be used when relevant, are these:
Layer 1:
Layer 2: Title (of folder)
Layer 3: Title (of collection)
Layer 4: Place of access = Library and Locale.
In the case at hand:
Assembled, your First Reference Note citation (with coloration to distinguish the three layers) would be this:
1. “Volunteer Descriptive List and Account of Pay and Clothing of 1st Sgt. Samuel Day,” 6 October 1866; collection LMC 1262: “Day, S. mss, 1857–1895”; Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
The citation does not use a URL. The document is not online. You’ve had to obtain the document from the library, either in person or by mail. If you wish to cite the online cataloging data for this collection, that would be done in a separate citation sentence, because it’s a separate citation to a separate source. For example:
2. Indiana University, Archives Online (https://archives.iu.edu/catalog/InU-Li-VAD6276 : accessed 13 June 2024), catalog entry for “Day, S. mss, 1857–1895.”
The two citations to the two separate sources may be placed into the same reference note:
1. . “Volunteer Descriptive List and Account of Pay and Clothing of 1st Sgt. Samuel Day,” 6 October 1866; collection LMC 1262: “Day, S. mss, 1857–1895”; Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. For further details on this collection, see Indiana University, Archives Online (https://archives.iu.edu/catalog/InU-Li-VAD6276 : accessed 13 June 2024), catalog entry for “Day, S. mss, 1857–1895.”
Wow, ok, many corrections to…
Wow, ok, many corrections to be made. I'm glad I asked. Thanks.
JeffH13, here at EE we don't…
JeffH13, here at EE we don't think in terms of "corrections." They are learning opportunities—and bits of knowledge that will help us in future work. :)